20-30 minutes of reading about logistics? Seriously?

Joe Byerly, in an excellent post at his blog ‘From the Green Notebook’ which was recently recirculated, reminds us of the importance of continual reading. He promotes 20-30 minutes of reading in a day (or night) as part of a ‘consistent practice of self-study’.  Reading about logistics, the difficulties encountered in sustaining and moving armies, should be part of this study. Yet very few people know about the important works on military logistics or know where to start. As it happens, I had been recently asked by a number of people which logistics books I would recommend to anyone who might be time-poor, or had only just made the decision to start reading on the topic. The timely repost of Byerly’s piece compelled me to answer this question properly (if a little evasively) and publically.

I maintain the view given at the time I was questioned; it ‘depends what you are after’. Because logistics is a process that includes so many different functions from the tactical to the national-economic, it is experienced in different ways by different people. For those in capability development, logistics is about efficiency, production and acquisition, whereas those in tactical formations see logistics as a variety of ‘small’, yet all-too-often ‘big’, things that give the formation the capacity to fight.A book such as Clements, The Lieutenant Don’t Know, examines a form of logistics worlds apart from Eccles, Logistics in the national defense.

With this in mind, I thought I should summarise what might be learned from what I feel are the most important works on military logistics. The choice with respect to relevancy is therefore your own. I have already gone a substantial part of the way here to outlining the basic principles of the literature, but for the sake of identifying who might benefit the most from reading each text:

  1. From Clausewitz, On War, the strategist will learn how logistics determines the ‘form or factor’ of operations.
  2. From Jomini, The Art of War, the commander will see how logistics is the ‘means and arrangements which work out the plans of strategy and tactics’.
  3. From Thorpe, Pure logistics, the commander will see way in which logistics ‘sets the stage’ for operations.
  4. From Eccles, Logistics in the national defense, the strategic logistician will learn of the processes of connecting the economy to the battlefield. The operational commander will learn that logistics requires control and oversight for it to be efficient and effective.
  5. From Macgruder, Recurring logistics problems as I have observed them, the tactical commander will be shown the importance of well-trained logistics troops, and that time is won in conflict by having effective advance / forward logistics early.
  6. From Van Creveld, Supplying War, you will be persuaded that strategy is second to logistics in modern war. However, because militaries rarely plan on this basis, logistics often seems ‘an overcoming of a series of difficulties’.
  7. From Lynn, Feeding Mars; Thomspon, Lifeblood of War, the operational and tactical commander will learn how contextual logistics is, and the need for adaptation in battle.
  8. From Huston, Sinews of War, the tactical and operational commander or logistician will learn of major principles of logistics as it applies to delivering ‘firepower or shock’, based upon a comprehensive study of centuries of conflict. Pagonis, Moving Mountains is a natural complement.
  9. From Macksey, For want of a nail, the commander and logistician will learn of the expansion of the ‘tail’ as compared to the ‘tooth’ with new technologies, and that logistics is fundamentally about affecting mobility (and thus time and space).
  10. From Tuttle, Defense logistics for the 21st century, the logistician will learn of the modern inputs to logistics capability and how they relate to expeditionary warfare.
  11. From Kane, Military logistics and strategic performance, the strategist will learn how logistics creates the circumstances for strategy and tactics, and is the ‘arbiter of opportunity’.
  12. From Engels, Alexander the Great and the logistics of the Macedonian army, and Roth, The logistics of the Roman army at war, the strategist will see how the basis of their work is found in logistics.

The books I have briefly described above are independently valuable, and each contribute their own perspective to a vital aspect of war. Some readers are likely to value certain books over others, or different books entirely; I will admit I have a natural tendency to favour the theory. However, I have found the list reflects the most important to how I have formed my opinion and understanding of logistics. After reading, and re-reading, the list of books above, I was left with the following conclusions about logistics:

  1. Logistics is essentially moving, supplying and maintaining forces. It is above all else concerned about the practical existence of forces as distinct from their employment.
  2. Logistics, as a process, connects the economy to the battlefield. In raising and sustaining forces, logistics comprises a vast proportion of a military’s time.
  3. Logistics is the application of time and space factors to operations. It is concerned with what can be moved and when. It is therefore the substance of strategy, and ‘sets the stage’ for tactics.
  4. Logistics is a self-sustaining system of many elements and countless, often contextual, inputs. If left ‘uncontrolled’ in war it has a tendency to grow inefficient, and in doing so, forces allocated to logistics tasks swell in size.
  5. War can be prepared for, and in this capacity, logistics influences all options. However, once battle commences, it is virtually impossible to plan logistics efficiently. ‘Brute force’ logistics often prevails.

Each book on logistics, including those many I have not mentioned here, deserves to be read. Twenty to thirty minutes of reading about military logistics is such a small proportion of time to devote to a topic so fundamentally relevant to success in war.

What can you expect? You will be left concerned with repetition of problems throughout history, and certainly the propensity of armies to outrun their means of supply with regularity. But you will be left with a sense of the ingenuity of logisticians, commanders and soldiers to overcome logistics issues through a variety of means unforseen prior to war. You will see how logistics does indeed shape how forces will fight, and that logistics leads strategy to its ultimate conclusion.

But most of all, you will also be left to question why so few of these works are on professional reading lists.


6 thoughts on “20-30 minutes of reading about logistics? Seriously?”

  1. Mate your point five …… that once battle commences it is virtually impossible to plan logistics efficiently. I find that an interesting observation? How did you arrive at that conclusion, it has been my opinion that as logisticians (I am talking big ‘L’ Logistics and not CSS) that once the battle has commenced and we step into war ….. not a ‘super nova’ style small war where the situation will continue to evolve and develop again and again ….. but a long ‘near pier’ war where I would think things will alter for the operational logistic planners once we pass the Strategic LD.
    In the preparation for a near peer war we will have many assumptions that we as logisticians will develop in order harness the NSB to support the many branches and sequels to meet the unknown. But when the battle commences these assumptions rapidly start to evaporate as they turn to fact …. the branches start to vanish as our almost magical supply chain emerges and we work hard to then manage this often fragile asset. We will gain a far better understand of our enemy …. their intentions and capabilities. Our strategy will gain fidelity and our logistic plan emerges.
    Things become somewhat clearer ….. cognisant of Clausewitz and the fog and friction that will exist in combat … we (remember I am talking big ‘L’ Logistics) start to develop our consumption rates and our actual OVP for the force. We will work hard to establish something akin a steady state! And the supply chain starts to reduce its fluctuations (there will always be idiots and mistakes will be made …. but), we will move from a more ‘wasteful’ effective based logistics model designed to meet the initial encounter and we will move to a more efficient model to ensure we can:
    a. Sustain the long war (and don’t drain the NSB) AND
    b. Rapidly hit a steady state in order to smooth the supply chain … reducing waste and optimising the scant resources we will have to ensure we are effectively efficient in killing and defeating our enemy!
    Things are much different when we discuss CSS but as an operational logistic planner I would think the goal would be efficiency in the long run!
    I am keen to better understand your thoughts on this point.


    1. I think we agree. My opinion is that logisticians are firstly tested on their assumptions (as you point out) and then by the context, which usually means combat. For some time logistics will be about plugging the gaps as they appear, or prioritising so to giving specific efforts as much support is practical. Add friction to the mix and this is really what the ‘logistic vacuum’ is about. The final goal is to maximise efficiency because that means you free resources for other areas or efforts.


    2. Colin, interesting intellectual approach. But with respect, too expansive. Whether big or small ‘L’ (your usage) – achieving effective/reasonable logistics requires no more than 1. Knowing the situation, no matter how fast it is changing; 2. Knowing what is needed to assist/counter/confront/confuse that situation; 3. Efficiently deliver immediately available/ effective materials/personnel to enable your force(s) to protect/withdraw from the situation. 4. Thereafter, with speed & efficiency, deliver acquirable materials/personnel to advance/hold/retreat from the situation. Front line commanders & their personnel, land sea & air, require no more. When put in place, these 4 points save lives on all sides of any conflict.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s